Right to Take | Doing it the Right (of) Way: Recommended Steps for the Acquisition of Real Property by Eminent Domain

Recent Posts

Apple Valley Draws a Line Between the Standard of Review For A Resolution of Necessity and Right to Take Objections When Condemning  Public Utility Property

A resolution of necessity carries powerful presumptions. But, those presumptions do not apply to right to take objections when an agency seeks to condemn a privately owned public utility. In Town of Apple Valley v. Apple Valley Ranchos Water, the…

Golf Courses

California Government Code § 37353 is a state law that sets limits on how local governments in California can acquire property—including when it comes to golf courses. While broadly authorizing certain types of municipal property acquisition, the statute contains an…

Review for CEQA Compliance

Staff or public agency counsel should confirm the proposed property acquisition complies with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).  This should be done before the agency adopts a resolution of necessity authorizing the property’s condemnation.  Reason.  The right to take…

Voluntary Abandonment

Any time after an eminent domain complaint is filed, including after a final judgment, a public agency may voluntarily abandon the condemnation.  This means that the property is no longer being taken, and as a result the owner receives no…

Consider a Relocation/Construction Agreement as an Alternative to a Temporary Construction Easement

A partial taking often necessitates that alterations be made to the remaining property so that it may best adapt to the changed circumstances caused by the taking.  In an earlier post from November 19, 2020, I questioned whether a temporary…

Liens

It is a common perception that lienholders like to be paid first when a property owner is compensated following the acquisition of property.  However, California’s Eminent Domain Law thinks differently when only a partial taking occurs. Section 1265.225(a) of the…